PCRI is a 501(c) (3)
Not-for-profit public charity
|
 |
Donate Helpline Decision
Aide About
Us Español  |
Events Newsletter PCRI
Papers Resources Search
|
 |
|
Review of Bolla Paper
American Society of Clinical
Oncology Abstracts
Prostate Cancer Key Abstracts
Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 15:
1996.
Bolla M, Gonzalez D, Warde P et al: Immediate hormonal therapy improves locoregional
control and survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. Results
of a randomized phase III clinical trial of the EORTC radiotherapy and genitourinary
tract cancer cooperative groups. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol
15:238, 1996.
This European study group randomized
patients with T1 or T2 clinical stage disease Gleason's scores of 8- 10 as
well as patients with T3 or T4 lesions who were N0 Nx M0 into 2 treatment
groups: Arm 1 received RT alone and Arm 2 received hormone blockade therapy
commencing at the start of RT. The regimen for androgen deprivation (AD)
used Cyproterone acetate (Androcur) for one month only at 150 mg per day
orally along with Goserelin acetate (Zoladex) 3.6 mg intramuscularly with
this drug used for a total of 3 years. Both treatment arms received 50 Gy
to the pelvis in 5 weeks given as 5 fractions per week, along with 20 Gy
as a prostatic boost in 2 weeks. The total dose to the prostate is therefore
70 Gy or 7000 cGy. A preliminary evaluation with a median of 33 months of
follow-up involved 385 patients. At entry to the study the median age was
71 years (range 51-80); the ECOG performance status was 0 in 79% of the patients.
The results are shown in the table below and are expressed as 5-years Kaplan-Meier
estimates(%) along with confidence intervals (95% c.i.).
| ARM
(No. of patients)
|
Local Control |
SURVIVAL
: 5 year Kaplan-Meier estimates |
|
|
Metastases-
Free |
Clinical Disease-Free |
Crude
Survival |
| RT Only (190) |
75 (64-86) |
56 (44-68) |
44 (32-56) |
56 (45-67) |
| RT + AD (195) |
95 (90-100) |
89 (83-95) |
85 (77-93) |
78 (69-87) |
| p value (logrank) |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
0.001 |
This is a significant paper with a key issue being: how important was the use
of AD for 36 months in affecting this survival data in patients followed for
a median of 33 months. If Labrie's data showed a crude survival of 82% at 3 years
in patients with minimal D-2 disease receiving combination hormone blockade then
a 78% crude survival using monotherapy with an LHRH agonist at essentially 3
years would not be at all surprising in lesser staged patients. Therefore is
the survival benefit really a contribution of AD? It would also be important
to look at biochemical progression-free survival using PSA, along with PAP and
CGA and also report the cause-specific survival data along with crude-
survival.
|
|
|
Prostate Cancer Research Institute (PCRI)
Material provided by PCRI is intended for educational purposes for discussion
with your physician and should not be considered as medical advice. Information
and opinions expressed on this website are not an endorsement by PCRI
for any treatment, product or service.
|