
Satraplatin AUA 2007 Presentation
Notes*
For News of FDA Review
Satraplatin significantly improves Progression Free Survival
(PFS) and pain control in patients with advanced hormone-refractory
prostate
cancer (HRPC): Preliminary results from the phase III SPARC trial
* Notes from slides provided by Oliver Sartor, MD for education of
advocates regarding Satraplatin results
SPARC: Randomized 2:1 Double Blind Trial with 950 Enrolled Patients
HRPC: failed 1 prior chemotherapy regimen
Arm A:
• Satraplatin 80 mg/m2 d1-5 q 35d
• Antiemetic 1 mg BID d1-5 q 35d
• Prednisone 5 mg BID
Arm B:
• Placebo 80 mg/m2 d1-5 q 35d
• Placebo* 1 mg BID d1-5 q 35d
• Prednisone 5 mg BID
All patients treated until progression, intolerable toxicity or death.
No crossovers allowed
Endpoints
Primary
• Progression Free Survival (PFS)
• Overall Survival (OS)
Secondary
• Time to Pain Progression (TTP)
Eligibility Criteria
• Progressive metastatic HRPC with radiographic or PSA progression
after a minimum of 2 courses of one (unspecified) chemotherapy
• Adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function
• Performance Status 0-2
• Continuation of prior bisphosphonate therapy was permitted
Definition of PFS
PFS = Composite endpoint based on first occurrence of
• Tumor Progression (RECIST for soft tissue
lesions, ? 2 new lesions on bone scan)
• Skeletal Event (fracture, RT, bone surgery,
initiation of bisphosphonates)
•
Symptomatic Progression (increase in PPI* score or analgesic consumption,
worsening of ECOG PS, weight loss >10%)
• Death
Assessment of PFS
• Treatment duration was determined by individual investigators
based on their own assessments of PFS and toxicity
•
PFS independently assessed by a “blinded” Independent
Review Committee (IRC)
Pain Assessment
• Patient diaries (patient reported outcome)
– Daily Present Pain Intensity (PPI) score
• McGill-Melzack questionaire
• 6 point scale: 0 = no pain, 5 = excruciating pain
– Daily analgesic use
• For Statistical Analysis, weekly average PPI and analgesic scores were
assessed centrally and blindly
– Analgesic score constructed using normalization of various opioid types
and dosing intervals
Pain Progression
•
Increase in PPI or analgesic score for = 2 weeks
–
Weekly average PPI
•
= 1 point vs baseline
or
•
= 2 points vs nadir
–
Weekly average analgesic score
•
> 25% vs baseline
Baseline Patient Characteristics
| |
Satraplatin
n=635 |
Placebo
n=315 |
| Age (Years) |
|
|
| Median |
70 |
68.0 |
| Range |
42-88 |
45-95 |
| Performance Status |
|
|
| 0-1 |
89.8% |
89.8% |
| 2 |
10.2% |
10.2% |
| Pain Index |
|
|
| 0 |
36.8% |
33.8% |
| 1-5 |
63.2% |
66.2% |
| Progression at Entry |
|
|
| Tumor |
61.7% |
61.9% |
| PSA only |
38.3% |
38.1% |
| Prior chemotherapy |
|
|
| Docetaxel |
51.5% |
50.8% |
| Paclitaxel |
2.7% |
2.9% |
| Mitoxantrone |
20.2% |
20.3% |
| Others |
25.6% |
26.0% |
| Bisphosphonate |
30.7% |
27.3% |
Progression Free Survival
ITT Population (# of patients Per Independent Review Committee)
|
Weeks
|
0
|
10
|
20
|
30
|
40
|
50
|
60
|
70
|
80
|
90
|
|
Satraplatin
|
635
|
363
|
229
|
143
|
90
|
63
|
43
|
24
|
18
|
12
|
|
Placebo
|
315
|
140
|
63
|
37
|
24
|
11
|
5
|
5
|
1
|
|
Progression Free Survival
ITT with Prior Docetaxel
|
Weeks
|
0
|
10
|
20
|
30
|
40
|
50
|
60
|
70
|
80
|
90
|
|
Satraplatin
|
327
|
167
|
107
|
69
|
39
|
28
|
19
|
13
|
9
|
5
|
|
Placebo
|
160
|
61
|
28
|
16
|
8
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
Time to Pain Progression
ITT Population
Satraplatin Placebo
| |
Satraplatin
|
Placebo
|
|
Pain progression events, N
(%)
|
217 (34.2%)
|
130 (41.3%)
|
|
Median
|
66.1 weeks
|
22.3 weeks
|
Response Rate Analyses
| |
Satraplatin
|
Placebo
|
|
All Patients
|
|
|
|
Pain (n = 351/181)
|
24.2
|
13.8
|
|
PSA (n = 476/225)
|
25.4
|
12.4
|
|
With Prior Docetaxel
|
|
|
|
Pain (n = 183/99)
|
25.7
|
13.1
|
|
PSA (n = 231/109)
|
28.6
|
12.8
|
Hematologic Toxicity
Grade 3/4
| |
Satraplatin + Prednisone
n=635
|
Placebo + Prednisone
n=315
|
|
WBC
|
|
|
|
Grade 3/4
|
86 (13.7)
|
2 (0.6)
|
|
Grade 4
|
6 (1.0)
|
0
|
|
Neutrophils
|
|
|
|
Grade 3/4
|
133 (21.1)
|
2 (0.6)
|
|
Grade 4
|
26 (4.1)
|
0
|
|
Febrile neutropenia
|
2 (0.3%)
|
0
|
|
Platelets
|
|
|
|
Grade 3/4
|
133 (21.1)
|
4 (1.3)
|
|
Grade 4
|
1 (0.2)
|
0
|
|
Platelet transfusions
|
3.8%
|
0.3%
|
|
Hgb
|
|
|
|
Grade 3/4
|
59 (9.4)
|
10 (3.2)
|
|
Grade 4
|
10 (1.6)
|
2 (0.6)
|
|
RBC transfusions
|
15.9%
|
8.0%
|
Non Hematologic Adverse Events
Grade 3/4
| |
Satraplatin + Prednisone
n=629
|
Placebo + Prednisone
n=313
|
|
Bilirubin
|
0.5%
|
0.0%
|
|
Serum Creatinine
|
0.8%
|
0.3%
|
|
Nausea
|
1.3%
|
0.3%
|
|
Vomiting
|
1.6%
|
0.0%
|
|
Diarrhea
|
2.1%
|
0.0%
|
|
Constipation
|
2.1%
|
1.0%
|
|
Fatigue/Asthenia
|
4.9%
|
2.6%
|
|
Infectious Episodes
|
4.0%
|
1.0%
|
|
Neuropathy
|
0.3%
|
0.3%
|
|
DVT
|
1.6%
|
0.0%
|
Summary
•
33% reduction in risk of disease progression or death
–
Results were consistent across study subsets, including those with
prior docetaxel
•
36% reduction in risk of pain progression
–
Results were consistent across study subsets, including those with
prior docetaxel
•
Satraplatin is very well tolerated
–
Grade 4 hematologic events are minimal
–
No grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events >5%
•
Satraplatin offers significant clinical benefit in patients currently
having an unmet need
For more information on Raise A Voice